I am using SGC for almost two years and I would like to share my experience with it.
It works constantly good and I did not face any troubles with it. I use it to control mother room and cloning room and honestly I did not have to change anything for a long time. SGC is very reliable once it is set up properly.
There is lot of things I can control with SCG. Lights, ventilators, heating, CO2 for more than one chamber. Interface is not the best in the world, but it is easy to undersant and to setup everything.
I very appreciate possibility of detail setting interface. Color spots on control panels and sensors are great and dummy proofed.
Memory works great, so even after blackouts caused from public distribution network, SGC always get back to program it has.
- Great possibility to export data and see graphs of temperature, humidity, light, CO2 etc.
I tested three versions of SGC already and the most difficult think was always its connecting to local Wi-Fi fgor the first time. Once you pair it, you don't have to do it again, so it is not such a big deal but it could be improved.
In general, I think it would helps if connecting will be faster and more stable. If SGC has its own application for remote control, it would be even better.
In general, I am satisfied with SGC on a long term base and I hope other growers will be too.
If you want to ask me some questions about using SGC, please send me an email to firstname.lastname@example.org
Add a Comment
About This Community
|Asked: 11/22/20, 8:25 AM|
|Seen: 25 times|
|Last updated: 11/22/20, 8:25 AM|